Correction: Are Treatments More Effective than Placebos? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
نویسندگان
چکیده
Among studies with continuous outcomes in our systematic review comparing placebo effect sizes with treatment effect sizes we calculated mean differences between to estimate placebo effects, treatment effects, and the difference between placebo and treatment effects. In fact the standardized mean difference should have been used. There was no error in the calculations among studies with binary outcomes. We have corrected this error and revised Figs 3, 4 and 5 from our review here. Correcting the error strengthened our conclusion that there is rarely a statistically significant difference (at P = 0.05 or lower) between the magnitude of placebo effects and the magnitude of treatment effects. In the original review placebo effect sizes and treatment effect sizes did not differ by a statistically significant amount in the three subgroup analyses: all studies with objective outcomes (treatment effects larger), studies of anxiety treatments (treatment effects larger), and studies where all criteria for ruling out bias were met (placebo effects larger).
منابع مشابه
Are Treatments More Effective than Placebos? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND Placebos are widely used in clinical practice in spite of ethical restrictions. Whether such use is justified depends in part on the relative benefit of placebos compared to 'active' treatments. A direct test for differences between placebo and 'active' treatment effects has not been conducted. OBJECTIVES We aimed to test for differences between treatment and placebo effects within...
متن کاملClinical efficacy of local injection therapies for lateral epicondylitis: A systematic review and network meta-analysis
Background: We aimed to compare the efficacy of local injection therapies for lateral epicondylitis in a Bayesian framework. Methods: We searched the Embase, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Scopus, and ProQuest, for randomized controlled trials published from inception to February 2021 in any languages. The injection therapies included corticosteroids (C...
متن کاملPrevention of Relapse and Recurrence in Adults with Major Depressive Disorder: Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses of Controlled Trials
BACKGROUND Findings of substantial remaining morbidity in treated major depressive disorder (MDD) led us to review controlled trials of treatments aimed at preventing early relapses or later recurrences in adults diagnosed with MDD to summarize available data and to guide further research. METHODS Reports (n = 97) were identified through systematic, computerized literature searching up to Feb...
متن کاملEffectiveness of Paromomycin on Cutaneous Leishmaniasis in Iran: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Background: Some treatment reported for cutaneous leishmaniasis. The studies examined the impact of the paromomycin has different characteristics and results. The aim of the present study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of all randomized clinical trials evaluating the effectiveness of paromomycin in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Iran.Methods: Literature search...
متن کاملAcceptance and commitment therapy: a meta-analytic review.
BACKGROUND There are now a substantial number of controlled trials investigating the efficacy of acceptance and commitment therapy (ACT). This meta-analysis combined multiple well-controlled studies to help clarify the overall impact of ACT relative to waiting lists, psychological placebos, treatment as usual, and established therapies. METHOD A comprehensive literature search produced 18 ran...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
دوره 11 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2016